06-Aug-2009
If you are one of the thousands of
landlords in the UK without sufficient insurance for your properties, it might
be time to consider upping your protection. New research by Landlord Insurance specialist RedBrick, a
division of the Paragon Group of Companies, shows that many landlords are
failing to protect their rental properties, and the revenue they make from
them, adequately. 71 per cent of
landlords fully expect there to be an increased risk of tenants defaulting on
their rental payments in 2009, although a shocking 12 per cent of landlords are
covered for this in their insurance.
Although it might seem like the
cost-effective option to take out a standard home insurance policy - which up to a
third of UK landlords have opted to do - there are many areas where this type of
insurance will afford you no protection whatsoever. In the same way that buy to let mortgages are tailored
to those who are buying rental properties, landlord insurance is the only cover
that provides full cover for legal bills, rental defaults and malicious
damage.
Tony Armitage,
Redbrick Landlords Insurance director, says: 'Landlords need to carefully
consider their insurance needs and ensure that they are properly protected. It
is amazing that only two thirds of landlords have specialist buildings
insurance, with the other third presumably having a standard household policy
or, worryingly, no insurance at all.
'In addition, tenant
arrears are on the increase and landlords can easily cover themselves for rent
arrears through a rent guarantee insurance product, which also includes the
legal expenses involved in evicting the tenant. There appears to be a lack of
awareness about the availability of these products and in the current
environment landlords should be doing all they can to protect themselves.
'Buy-to-let landlords
have sophisticated insurance requirements for which a typical household policy
is often unsuitable. The biggest irony is that some landlords are actually
paying through the nose for potentially unsuitable cover.'
So what are you missing out on if you are a
buy to let landlord with standard home insurance? Firstly, cover against the house being empty for long periods
of time. Most home insurance
policies will cover the property for up to 30 days while the owner-occupier is
away, but no longer because of the obvious security risks of having a fully
furnished house lying empty. If
you have a couple of months in between tenants or you are carrying out work on
the property, it's more than likely that this will happen. If there is a break-in after the 30-day
period, you could be left to pay the costs of repairing and replacing out of
your own pocket.
As any buy to let landlord who has had tenant troubles in the past will know, there are a
number of things that can go wrong.
A specialist landlord policy will cover you for malicious damage to the
property inflicted by a tenant, but the average household insurance policy will
exclude this. If the tenant does
not pay their bills, effectively you are left helpless unless you have
protection under a rent guarantee scheme.
With protection, you are covered for the potentially extensive legal
costs of evicting a problem tenant.
Landlord Insurance will also cover you for legal bills should someone be
injured whilst carrying out work to your property, whereas residential home
insurance will usually not make the grade in this situation.
Although buildings insurance is usually an
essential requirement when you take out a buy to let mortgage, the same cannot
be said for landlord contents and tenants insurance, and it is left up to the individual to decide which type of insurance is best. A buy to let property is such a significant investment
that it pays to have the correct level of cover. If gloomy predictions of tenant defaults are accurate and
interest rates do continue to rise, you can at least ensure that you and your
rental property are as protected as possible against every eventuality.
Find out more about Landlord Insurance and get a quote today!